From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

Hi,
Is there a way to get the message base to sort messages that come into an area in date format?
When reading I see messages that are not always in date order.
i suspect this is because of delays in messages getting distributed via qwk or ftn.
Would this be a message reader function onr an index procedure inside the database?

Thanks,
Tom
--- SBBSecho 3.34-Linux
* Origin: telnet://cwshack.ddns.net:2330 (1:135/205)
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
* Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
--- Synchronet 3.20b-Win32 NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

To: Tom Moore
Re: Message Base Question
By: Tom Moore to All on Sat Jan 17 2026 05:40 pm

Hi,
Is there a way to get the message base to sort messages that come into an area in date format?
When reading I see messages that are not always in date order.
i suspect this is because of delays in messages getting distributed via qwk or ftn.
Would this be a message reader function onr an index procedure inside the database?

That'd be a message reader function, but likely pretty frustrating for users. The date/time stamps on messages aren't very accurate (especially considering different timezones). I don't think the results would be good.
--
digital man (rob)

Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #64:
POP3 = Post Office Protocol version 3
Norco, CA WX: 67.6øF, 23.0% humidity, 2 mph E wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
* Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
--- Synchronet 3.20b-Win32 NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

To: Digital Man
Re: Message Base Question
By: Digital Man to Tom Moore on Sat Jan 17 2026 19:28:34

The date/time stamps on messages aren't very accurate (especially considering different timezones).

Funny this comes up. I have my msg. pointers set to see msgs. for just the last six months. I was reading a bunch of msgs. yesterday and amongst the 2026 msgs. came several 2020 msgs, then back to the present. Weird.

---
þ Synchronet þ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
* Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
--- Synchronet 3.20b-Win32 NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

To: Mortar
Re: Message Base Question
By: Mortar to Digital Man on Sun Jan 18 2026 03:52 pm

Re: Message Base Question
By: Digital Man to Tom Moore on Sat Jan 17 2026 19:28:34

The date/time stamps on messages aren't very accurate (especially considering different timezones).

Funny this comes up. I have my msg. pointers set to see msgs. for just the last six months. I was reading a bunch of msgs. yesterday and amongst the 2026 msgs. came several 2020 msgs, then back to the present. Weird.

Message pointers determine what message you'll see in a new-scan based on their *import* date/time, not the date/time they were supposedly written (which is the date/time shown in the message header to users). So, not weird really. Someone just dumped some old messages into a network, it happens a lot.
--
digital man (rob)

This Is Spinal Tap quote #12:
Nigel Tufnel: Well, I don't know - wh-wh-... what're the hours?
Norco, CA WX: 72.2øF, 36.0% humidity, 5 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
* Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
--- Synchronet 3.20b-Win32 NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

To: Digital Man
Re: Message Base Question
By: Digital Man to Mortar on Sun Jan 18 2026 17:07:44

Message pointers determine what message you'll see in a new-scan based on their *import* date/time, not the date/time they were supposedly written (which is the date/time shown in the message header to users). So, not weird really. Someone just dumped some old messages into a network, it happens a lot.

Well, since the user can't see the import date (or can they?), makes more sense (IMO) to have the pointers use the date written date, which is more meaningful to the user.

---
þ Synchronet þ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
* Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
--- Synchronet 3.20b-Win32 NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

To: Mortar
Re: Message Base Question
By: Mortar to Digital Man on Sun Jan 18 2026 03:52 pm

considering different timezones).

Funny this comes up. I have my msg. pointers set to see msgs. for
just the last six months. I was reading a bunch of msgs. yesterday
and amongst the 2026 msgs. came several 2020 msgs, then back to the
present. Weird.

talk to the sysop.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
* Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
--- Synchronet 3.20b-Win32 NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

To: Mortar
Re: Good Pointers
By: Mortar to Digital Man on Sun Jan 18 2026 07:21 pm

Re: Message Base Question
By: Digital Man to Mortar on Sun Jan 18 2026 17:07:44

Message pointers determine what message you'll see in a new-scan based on their *import* date/time, not the date/time they were supposedly written (which is the date/time shown in the message header to users). So, not weird really. Someone just dumped some old messages into a network, it happens a lot.

Well, since the user can't see the import date (or can they?), makes more sense (IMO) to have the pointers use the date written date, which is more meaningful to the user.

Except that messages are imported or sorted by "written date".
--
digital man (rob)

Steven Wright quote #27:
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.
Norco, CA WX: 66.0øF, 36.0% humidity, 2 mph NW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
* Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
--- Synchronet 3.20b-Win32 NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

To: Mortar

Re: Message Base Question
By: Digital Man to Mortar on Sun Jan 18 2026 17:07:44

Message pointers determine what message you'll see in a new-scan based

on

their *import* date/time, not the date/time they were supposedly

written

(which is the date/time shown in the message header to users). So, not

weird

really. Someone just dumped some old messages into a network, it

happens a

lot.

Well, since the user can't see the import date (or can they?), makes more sense (IMO) to have the pointers use the date written date, which is more meaningful to the user.

I don't know how that would work, every message area would constantly have to be reindexed if that were the case...

--
Shurato, Sysop Shurato's Heavenly Sphere (ssh, telnet, pop3, ftp,nntp,
,wss) (Ports 22,23,110,21,119,999)


*** THE READER V4.50 [freeware]
---
* Origin: Shurato's Heavenly Sphere telnet://shsbbs.net (1:340/1101)
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
* Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
--- Synchronet 3.20b-Win32 NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet

To: Mortar
Re: Good Pointers
By: Mortar to Digital Man on Sun Jan 18 2026 07:21 pm

Well, since the user can't see the import date (or can they?),
makes more sense (IMO) to have the pointers use the date written
date, which is more meaningful to the user.

if you're having these kinds of problems you should really talk to
the sysop of the bbs. you shouldn't be experiencing any severe msg lags
like you mentioned.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
* Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
--- Synchronet 3.20b-Win32 NewsLink 1.2