From Newsgroup: soc.culture.magyar
On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 23:45:54 +0200, me wrote:
A kései rehabilitálás. Tkp. az elsofokú bíróságot kellene
sokmilliós jóvátételre ítélni! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KA5APNkdSgw
Elég felháborító hogy azért vesztette állását és
végül hagyta el saját hazáját valaki mert idegenek
által bevezetett politically-correct ellen gáncsolni
*merészelte* egy teveszaros betörő gengszter csürhe
tagjait. Ezért nem csak jóvátételre való ítélet jár,
(ami amúgy is nehéz de segit ha az az első bírák
fizetéséből is jön ki), senem csak felmentés, hanem
permanens padvesztés az első biráknak!!!
--
értékrend háború dörög, nyerni kell vagy beledögleni.
From my dynamic "I smell a skunk" checklist:
Law in a democracy cannot be extrinsic and is a
code of conduct which must be acceptable to the
majority which mandates it to govern itself, the
justice thus served needing to be also SEEN as
being just. For every trial the available idle
judge with the fewest yellow cards should be
appointed. Other than possible appeals, when an
accused for not more than the 3rd time in his
life (or the crown at any time) doubts before or
after sentencing the impartiality of the appointed
judge s/he should be able to request override
which the minister of justice should then be
obliged to grant by appointing a tribunal of
3 judges to work with but not command a jury
of at least 6 peers none of these judges or
jurors sharing any common attributes in their
backgrounds. The thus penciled (bumped) judge
would get a yellow card, the principle being
quite basic: a judge must be capable of not only
always knowing what an impartial sentence by 3
judges and a jury would be, but also of
supporting this prerequisite as historical fact
in his career record and to continuously project
same into his reputation (judges with more than
ten yellow cards should be permanently disbenched).
V-2021-01-25.
--- Synchronet 3.20b-Win32 NewsLink 1.2